Ajattelutaidot ja tiedon ulottuvuudet vuosiluokkien 7–9 maantiedon osaamistavoitteissa ja päättöarvioinnin kriteereissä
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30677/terra.144616Avainsanat:
geography, learning objectives, National Core Curriculum for Basic Education, final assessment criteria, The Revised Bloom's TaxonomyAbstrakti
This research analyzes the distribution of thinking skills and knowledge dimensions in the geography learning objectives in grades 7–9 (pupils aged 13 to 16), and in the national final assessment criteria applied at the end of grade 9. The revised Bloom’s taxonomy was used as a framework for the content analysis. The results reveal that the thinking skills in the geography learning objectives mainly include understanding, applying, and analyzing, whereas the knowledge dimensions emphasize conceptual and procedural knowledge. The thinking skills in the assessment criteria are distributed by grades. For instance, grade 5 (in the grading scale from 5 to 10) includes only lower-order thinking skills, whereas only grade 9 includes all the higher-order thinking skills. The comparison between the learning objectives and the assessment criteria indicates that achieving higher grades (9–10) requires higher-order thinking skills more than the learning objectives demand. The results suggest that the alignment between the learning objectives and assessment criteria should be carefully considered in the planning and implementing of the curriculum.
Lähdeviitteet
Airasian, P. W. & Miranda, H. (2002) The role of assessment in the revised taxonomy. Theory into Practice 41(4) 249–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_8
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J. & Wittrock, M. (2014) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s. Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh.
Atjonen, P., Laivamaa, H., Levonen, A., Orell, S., Saari, M., Sulonen, K., Tamm, M., Kamppi, P., Rumpu, N., Hietala, R. & Immonen, J. (2019) ”Että tietää missä on menossa”. Oppimisen ja osaamisen arviointi perusopetuksessa ja lukiokoulutuksessa. Julkaisuja 7. Kansallinen koulutuksen arviointikeskus.
Baird, J.-A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N. & Stobart, G. (2017) Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in education: Principles. Policy & Practice 24(3) 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
Bednarz, S. W. (2019) Geography’s secret powers to save the world. Canadian Geographer 63(4) 520–529. http://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12539
Béneker, T. & Van Der Vaart, R. (2020) The knowledge curve: combining types of knowledges leads to powerful thinking. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 29(3) 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1749755
Biddulph, M., Béneker, T., Mitchell, D., Hanus, M., Zwartjes, L. & Donert, K. (2020) International research in geographical and teaching powerful geographical knowledge – a matter of social justice: initial findings from the GeoCapabilities 3 project. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 29(3) 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1749756
Bijsterbosch E., van der Schee J. & Kuiper W. (2017) Meaningful learning and summative assessment in geography education: an analysis in secondary education in the Netherlands. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 26(1) 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2016.1217076
Büken, R. & Artvinli, E. (2021) Analysis of geography attainments in the social sciences curriculum of Turkey according to the revised Bloom's taxonomy. Romanian Review of Geographical Education 10(2) 89–107. https://doi.org/10.23741/RGE220215
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J. & Neville, A. J. (2014) The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum 41(5) 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
Chang, C. H. & Kidman, G. (2019) Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment in geographical–for whom and for what purpose? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 28(1) 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1578526
Cohen, L., Morrison, K. & Manion, L. (2011) Research methods in education. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539-34
Curtis, M. D. (2019) Professional technologies in schools: The role of pedagogical knowledge in teaching with geospatial technologies. Journal of Geography 118(3) 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1544267
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2013) Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative Research. Teoksessa Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (toim.) Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 1–42. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1) 107–115. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (2019) Key competences for lifelong learning. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2766/569540
Gardner, J., O´Leary, M. & Yuan, L. (2021) Artificial intelligence in educational assessment: ‘Breakthrough? Or buncombe and ballyhoo? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37(5) 1207–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12577
Hildén, R., Ouakrim-Soivio, N. & Rautopuro, J. (2016) Kaikille ansionsa mukaan? Perusopetuksen päättöarvioinnin yhdenvertaisuus Suomessa. Kasvatus 47(4) 342–357.
Hynynen, L., Jylhä, M., Lammi, P., Nylen, T. & Muukkonen, P. (2023) Geomediakyvykkyys, geomedialukutaito ja niiden kehittyminen. Terra 135(2) 92–98. https://terra.journal.fi/article/view/129399
Janks, H. (2013). Critical literacy in teaching and research 1. Education Inquiry 4(2) 225–242. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i2.22071
Jo, I. & Bednarz, S. W. (2009) Evaluating geography textbook questions from a spatial perspective: Using concepts of space, tools of representation, and cognitive processes to evaluate spatiality. Journal of Geography 108(1) 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340902758401
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002) A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice 41(4) 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Krause, U., Béneker, T. & van Tartwijk, J. (2021) Geography textbook tasks fostering thinking skills for the acquisition of powerful knowledge. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 31(1) 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2021.1885248
Krause, U., Béneker, T., Van Tartwijk, J., Uhlenwinkel, A. & Bolhuis, S. (2017) How do the German and Dutch curriculum contexts influence (the use of) geography textbooks? Review of International Geographical Education Online 7(3) 235–63. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/rigeo/issue/40888/493166 26.10.2024.
Kuisma, M. & Nokelainen, P. (2018) Effects of progressive inquiry on cognitive and affective learning outcomes in adolescents’ geography education. Frontline Learning Research 6(2) 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i2.309
Kumpas-Lenk, K., Eisenschmidt, E. & Veispak, A. (2018) Does the design of learning outcomes matter from students’ perspective? Studies in Educational Evaluation 59, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.008
Lambert, D., Solem, M. & Tani, S. (2015) Achieving human potential through geography education: a capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105(4) 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1022128
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174.
Lane, R. & Bourke, T. (2017) Assessment in geography education: A systematic review. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 28(1) 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1385348
Lombard, M., Snyder‐Duch, J. & Bracken, C. C. (2002) Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human communication research 28(4) 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Luke, A. (2012) Critical literacy: foundational notes. Theory into practice 51(1) 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324
Luke, A. (2013) Defining critical literacy. Teoksessa Pandya, J. & Ávila, J. (toim.) Moving critical literacies forward, 19–31. Routledge.
Lukiokoulutuksen opiskelijoita 109 600 vuonna 2022. Tilastokeskus, Helsinki 2023. https://www.stat.fi/julkaisu/cl8jrqqw06ynw0dutoqml4goi 15.1.2024
Maude, A. (2017) Applying the concept of powerful knowledge to school geography. Teoksessa Brooks, C., Butt, G. & Fargher, M. (toim.). The power of geographical thinking. 27–40, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49986-4_11
Maude, A. (2018) Geography and powerful knowledge: a contribution to the debate. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 27(2) 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1320899
Maude, A. & Caldis, S. (2019) Teaching higher-order thinking and powerful geographical knowledge through the Stage 5 biomes and food security unit. Geographical Education 32, 30–39.
Mishra, R. K. (2015) Mapping the knowledge topography: A critical appraisal of geography textbook questions. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 24(2) 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.993170
Muukkonen, P., Hynynen, L., Jäntti, L. & Lammi, P. (2022) Geomedia on keskeinen osa maantieteen opetusta, mutta miksi ja mitä se on? Terra 134(3) 191–193. https://terra.journal.fi/article/view/121685
Neuendorf, K. (2017) Reliability. Teoksessa Neuendorf, K. (toim.) The content analysis guidebook, 165–200. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878
O’Connor, C. & Joffe, H. (2020) Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Opetushallitus (2016) Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014. Määräykset ja ohjeet 2014:96. Opetushallitus, Helsinki. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf 20.10.2023
Opetushallitus (2019) Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2019. Määräykset ja ohjeet 2019: 2a. Opetushallitus, Helsinki. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/lukion_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2019.pdf 20.10.2023.
Opetushallitus (2020) Perusopetuksen päättöarvioinnin kriteerit. Määräys OPH-5042-2020. Opetushallitus, Helsinki. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/Perusopetuksen%20p%C3%A4%C3%A4tt%C3%B6arvioinnin%20kriteerit%2031.12.2020_0.pdf 20.10.2023
Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö (2024) Peruskoulun tulevaisuustyö luo vision peruskoulun pitkän aikavälin kehittämiselle. https://okm.fi/-/peruskoulun-tulevaisuustyo-luo-vision-peruskoulun-pitkan-aikavalin-kehittamiselle 4.6.2024
Ormond, B. M. (2019) The impact of standards-based assessments on knowledge for history education in New Zealand. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 26(2) 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1432564
Osborne, Z. M., van de Gevel, S. L., Eck, M. A. & Sugg, M. (2020) An assessment of geospatial technology integration in K–12 education. Journal of Geography 119(1) 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2019.1640271
Pellikka, A., Nylen, T., Hirvensalo, V., Hynynen, L., Lutovac, S. & Muukkonen, P. (2024) Understanding teachers’ perceptions of geomedia: Concerns about students’ critical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education 144, 104607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104607
Perusopetuksen suorittaneet 2022. Vipunen – Opetushallinnon tilastopalvelu, Helsinki 2024. https://vipunen.fi/fi-fi/_layouts/15/xlviewer.aspx?id=/fi-fi/Raportit/Esi-%20ja%20perusopetus%20-%20suorittaneet%20-%20maakunta.xlsb 15.1.2024.
Perusopetusasetus 1998/852. Arviointi opintojen aikana. Annettu 21.8.1988 Helsingissä. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1998/19980852#a852-1998
Perusopetuslaki 1998/628. Oppilaan arviointi. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1998/19980628#L5P22
Pulkkinen, J., Hildén, R., Ketonen, L., Khawaja, A., Kotila, J., Mäkipää, T., Nissinen, K., Puhakka, E., Rantala, J., Rautopuro, J., Sulkunen, S., Söyrinki, S. & Tammelin-Laine, T. (2024) Arviointiuudistuksen alkutaipaleella. Perusopetuksen päättöarviointitutkimuksen loppuraportti. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2024: 6. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö, Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-263-723-9
Puttick, S. (2021) Digital technologies and their roles in knowledge recontextualization
and curriculum making. Teoksessa Walshe, N. & Healy, G. (toim.) Geography education in the digital world. linking theory and practice, 34–45. Routledge, New York.
Quakrim-Soivio, N., Pulkkinen, J., Rautopuro, J. & Hildén, R. (2018) Toteutuuko perusopetuksen tasa-arvo? Katsaus oppimistulosten arviointeihin. Kasvatus 49(5) 415–430.
Reichertz, J. (2014) Induction, deduction, abduction. Teoksessa Flick, U. (toim.) The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis, 123–135. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243
Saarinen, J., Venäläinen, S., Johnson, P., Cantell, H., Jakobsson, G., Koivisto, P., Routti, M., Väänänen, J., Huhtanen, M., Kivistö, A. &Viitala, M. (2019) OPS-työn askeleita – Esi- ja perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteiden 2014 toimeenpanon arviointi. Kansallisen koulutuksen arviointikeskus. Julkaisut 1:2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/301715
Sailer, M., Murböck, J. & Fischer, F. (2021) Digital learning in schools: What does it take beyond digital technology? Teaching and Teacher Education 103, 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103346
Silfverberg, H. (2016) Opetussuunnitelmauudistuksen implikoima tavoitetason nousu matematiikassa ja luonnontieteissä - totta vai tarua? FMSERA Journal 1(1) 22–31. https://journal.fi/fmsera/article/view/61024/27031 26.10.2024.
Stoltman, J., Lidstone, J. & Kidman, G. (2014) Geography and international assessment: Opportunity or distraction. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 23(3) 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.927172
Tani, S., Cantell, H. & Hilander, M. (2020) Ylioppilaskokeet ja maantieteen merkityksellinen tieto. Terra 132(1) 3–16. https://doi.org/10.30677/terra.82739
Tikkanen, G. & Aksela, M. (2012) Analysis of Finnish chemistry matriculation examination questions according to cognitive complexity. Nordina 8(3) 258–268. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.532
Torrance, H. (2011) Using assessment to drive the reform of schooling: time to stop pursuing the chimera? British Journal of Education Studies 59(4) 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.62944
Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. (2018) Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. Tammi, Helsinki.
Vasquez, V. M., Janks, H. & Comber, B. (2019) Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Language arts 96(5) 300–311.
Virranmäki, E., Valta-Hulkkonen, K. & Pellikka, A. (2020) Geography tests in the Finnish matriculation examination in paper and digital forms – An analysis of questions based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Studies in Educational Evaluation 66, 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc. 2020.100896
Virranmäki, E., Valta-Hulkkonen, K. & Pellikka, A. (2021) Geography curricula objectives and students’ performance – enhancing the students’ higher-order thinking skills? Journal of Geography 120(3) 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.1877330
Virranmäki, E. (2022) Geography´s ability to enhance powerful thinking skills and knowledge. Nordia Geographical Publications 51(1) 1–78. Akateeminen väitöskirja. Oulun yliopisto. https://doi.org/10.30671/nordia.113997
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S. & Punie, Y. (2022) DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens - With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
Walan, S. (2020) Embracing digital technology in science classrooms—secondary school teachers’ enacted teaching and reflections on practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology 29(3) 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09828-6
Wertheim, J. A. & Edelson, D. C. (2013) A road map for improving geography assessment. Geography Teacher 10(1) 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338341. 2012.758044
Yang, D. (2013) Comparing assessments within junior geography textbooks used in Mainland China. Journal of Geography 112(2) 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.648211
Ylioppilastutkintolautakunta (2023) Uusintojen osuus ilmoittautumisissa kokeittain 2019–2023. https://tiedostot.ylioppilastutkinto.fi/ext/stat/FS2023A2019T2041.pdf 15.1.2024.
Zoller, U. & Pushkin, D. (2007) Matching higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS) promotion goals with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 8(2) 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90028C
Tiedostolataukset
Julkaistu
Numero
Osasto
Lisenssi
Copyright (c) 2024 Terra

Tämä työ on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä 4.0 Kansainvälinen Julkinen -lisenssillä.